Caroline Giuliani was initially charged with the following crimes:
PL 155.25 – Petit Larceny, and
PL 165.40 – Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the 5th Degree
Ms. Giuliani was given a Desk Appearance Ticket (“DAT”) and her arraignment was set down for today in New York Criminal Court. As per The New York Times Ms. Giuliani accepted an Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (“ACD”) in full satisfaction of the charges against her, with a conditional discharge – the condition being that she does one day community service and stays out of trouble for six (6) months. This is generally the type of deal offered by New York County District Attorneys Office (“NYCDA”) on a case like this. As long as Ms. Giuliani does her community service, and does not get re-arrested within the six (6) month period the case will be dismissed and sealed and Ms. Giuliani can move on with her life.
One thing that Ms. Giuliani should be aware of is that under the New York General Obligations Law 11-105, Sephora the (“Complainant”) in this case can still pursue a civil claim against her that is seperate from the criminal action. The statute is posted below in full.
New York General Obligations Law 11-105
1. When used in this section, the term “mercantile establishment” shall mean a place or vehicle where goods, wares or merchandise are offered for sale or a place or vehicle from which deliveries of goods, wares or merchandise are made.
2. When used in this section, the term “larceny” is an act heretofore defined or known as common law larceny by trespassory taking as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 155.05 of the penal law committed against the property of a mercantile establishment.
3. When used in this section, the term “emancipated minor” shall mean a person who was over the age of sixteen at the time of the alleged larceny and who was no longer a dependent of or in the custody of a parent or legal guardian.
4. In any proceeding brought under this section the burden of proof shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.
5. An adult or emancipated minor who commits larceny against the property of a mercantile establishment shall be civilly liable to the operator of such establishment in an amount consisting of:
(a) the retail price of the merchandise if not recovered in merchantable condition up to an amount not to exceed fifteen hundred dollars; plus
(b) a penalty not to exceed the greater of five times the retail price of the merchandise or seventy-five dollars; provided, however, that in no event shall such penalty exceed five hundred dollars.6. Parents or legal guardians of an unemancipated minor shall be civilly liable for said minor who commits larceny against the property of a mercantile establishment to the operator of such establishment in an amount consisting of:
(a) the retail price of the merchandise if not recovered in merchantable condition up to an amount not to exceed fifteen hundred dollars; plus
(b) a penalty not to exceed the greater of five times the retail price of the merchandise or seventy-five dollars; provided, however, that in no event shall such penalty exceed five hundred dollars.7. A conviction or a plea of guilty for committing larceny is not a prerequisite to the bringing of a civil suit, obtaining a judgment, or collecting that judgment under this section.
8. The fact that an operator of a mercantile establishment may bring an action against an individual as provided in this section shall not limit the right of such merchant to demand, orally or in writing, that a person who is liable for damages and penalties under this section remit the damages and penalties prior to the commencement of any legal action.
9. In any action brought under subdivision six of this section, the court shall consider in the interest of justice mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the actions of the parent or legal guardian in supervising the unemancipated minor who committed the larceny.
10. An action for recovery of damages and penalties under this section may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction.
11. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit or limit any other cause of action which an operator of a mercantile establishment may have against a person who unlawfully takes merchandise from the mercantile establishment.
12. Any testimony or statements of the defendant or unemancipated minor child of the defendant or any evidence derived from an attempt to reach a civil settlement or from a civil proceeding brought under this section shall be inadmissible in any other court proceeding relating to such larceny.
The statute provides a minimum as well as a maximum penalty authorized by law. The Complainant can sue for up to five (5) times the amount of the value of the item that was stolen. The minimum the Complainant can demand is seventy five dollars ($75.00), and the maximum the Complainant can demand is five hundred dollars ($500.00.)
If the merchandise is recovered then the Complainant is subject to the minimum and maximum penalty above. If the merchandise is not recovered, the store can recover its value up to fifteen hundred ($1,500.00) dollars plus the statutory penalty. Further, a conviction in the criminal case is not a prerequisite to the Complainant bringing a civil case under this statute. The burden here is a preponderance of evidence.
Todd A. Spodek Esq. is a criminal defense attorney with Storobin & Spodek, LLP.